Jim Gilchrist has regrets
Posted in Ben on June 26th, 2008 by benAn interesting article at the OCRegister shows Minuteman Project founder Jim Gilchrist in a more reflective mode than one might usually find him. His views on the first 4 years of his civilian border defense project, and those that have come to assist him with his mission seem to have soured:
After seeing online videos that encouraged border violence amid calls to crack down on illegal immigration, the 59-year-old Aliso Viejo resident said he feels responsible for what started out as a publicity campaign and has since fallen prey to internal divisions and to influence by people he believed had “Saddam Hussein mentalities.”
“In retrospect, had I seen this, had I had a crystal ball to see what is going to happen… Am I happy? No,” Gilchrist said in a phone conversation late last week. “Am I happy at the outcome of this whole movement? I am very, very sad, very disappointed.”
Some will probably not take these words seriously, and perhaps Gilchrist earned that lack of trust himself. One wonders how he would take stock of his own missteps in leading the organization, i.e. hiring members of the National Alliance, a white nationalist organization, to run phone banks and computer networks. Or making “not so” subtly veiled threats, such as this one in 2006:
“I’m not going to promote insurrection, but if it happens, it will be on the conscience of the members of Congress who are doing this,” he said. “I will not promote violence in resolving this, but I will not stop others who might pursue that.” Link
I won’t say that Gilchrist is calling for an armed insurrection on the border, but if people want to make that assessment based on what he says (or nearly says), I’m not going to stop them. This and many many more statements and actions call into question the reasoning for his more recent ruminations.
“I have found, after four years in this movement (…) I very well may have been fighting for people with less character and less integrity than the ‘open border fanatics’ I have been fighting against,” he said. “And that is a phenomenal indictment of something I have created.”
For an organization such as the Minuteman Project to put the blame on its adherents not for how they are led, but how they are, says much of why the group has grown increasingly fractional and decreasingly functional over its short history. It is a crisis of leadership when those at the top cannot answer to their own failures.



