Recent U.S. state department warnings regarding travel to Mexico, particularly as they pertain to increased border violence and the targeted assassination of journalists made me fear Ciudad Juarez in a way I have yet to experience in other border towns.
Our role as multimedia producers is clearly not the same as the role of a journalist working for a daily in Juarez, however. The fact that we will only present three stories from this city and edited them in a motel room 200 miles away, statistically suggests that we are not the demographic to be delivered to the local morgue loaded with narco wounds.
And yet, wielding our cameras through the city’s grid in search of Juarez b-roll was unnerving. While stopped at traffic signals, for example, I was struck by my unprovoked suspicion of men in idling SUVs with tinted windows. I tried to keep my white eyes from wandering, but some of what is sinister about Juarez is also morbidly profound, and if you’re accustomed to standing behind a camera, it’s tough to hold your gaze upon the ground.
As a result of the brutal narco-turf war currently menacing the city, 230 people have died in Juarez in the first 113 days of this year. In addition to this record homicide rate, Mexican federal police have recently discovered over a dozen graves containing a total of 48 unidentified human bodies, some of them dismembered. Three of the bodies were those of women.
Estimates vary how many women have been murdered or have gone missing in Ciudad Juarez since 1993, but local women advocacy groups place both statistics above the 500 mark. According to Friends of the Women of Juarez, three of those women – all under the age of 17- have disappeared since the first of this year and 17 others have already been assassinated. Despite efforts by various Mexican police and government authorities to suggest otherwise, the Ciudad Juarez femicide horror is not over.
In light of this violence, Charles Bowden’s depiction of the Ciudad Juarez as the “laboratory of the future,” strikes me as a chilling concept and difficult to ignore given the city’s pattern of growth and role as a cheap labor hub for nearly 300 multinational factory-owners. 200,000 Mexican workers-mostly women-are employed by local maquiladoras but average wages remain unchanged at $60 per 50-hour work-week. Thus, the ability for one to transcend his or her economic class persistently evades the working class. All the while, migrants from further south continue the quest for improved livelihoods of their own, often choosing to settle in the outskirts of the city, in slums that lack electricity and running water. With few economic opportunities available in an already cash-strapped city, the lure of drug money becomes a powerful temptation.
In an attempt to gain some control of Juarez’s bloody drug war, the government of President Felipe Calderon has sent more than 2,500 soldiers and federal agents into this community of 1.6 million people. We saw them, in their tanks and anonymous ski-masks but our interviews with local residents revealed a reality that is becoming all too familiar to my border sensitive ears: try and squeeze the cartels here, and they’ll go elsewhere.
The question that I now find myself asking is: if Ciudad Juarez is really the laboratory of the future, how long will the current experiment be ignored? The militarization of the border appears to be an increasingly favored approach- by both governments -to addressing the systemic problems of illegal immigration and drug trafficking but I’m not so sure either country has the army power to perpetually patrol 2000 miles of a dominantly undeveloped no-man’s world. What seems more evident is that until regional economic disparity trends reverse, drug dealers, human traffickers, crooked cops and some very violent gangsters will have an indefinite supply of recruits for desperate armies of their own.